|
From
the title of this paper one may correctly assume that it
is an account of research in progress, of research which will
not end until it has been definitely established if the orchestral
score and (presumed) set of parts for the Concerto in E minor
for Violin and Orchestra, WoO 15 of Felix Draeseke are still
in existence (and where) or whether they have been irretrievably
lost. Has the concerto completely disappeared? This question
can be answered with a qualified "no", and
what follows is a report on the facts relevant to this answer.
Felix
Draeseke (1835-1913) wrote very little for solo instrument
and orchestra. There are, in fact, only four: the Concerto
in
E flat major for Piano and Orchestra, Op. 36 (1886), the
Symphonic Andante (Symphonisches Andante) for Cello and Orchestra,
WoO
11 (1876), the Concerto in E minor for Violin and Orchestra,
WoO 15 (1881) and a work for solo harp and orchestra, Feenzauber
(Fairy Magic), WoO 36 (1910) which, like the violin concerto,
has remained unperformed to this day. Only the piano concerto
has appeared in print, though a movement of the violin concerto
was published in an arrangement for violin and keyboard in 1915
(more about that later). The Symphonic Andante, though
performed in 1935 at a concert in Coburg honoring his 100th birthday,
was
never published, for the work poses a perplexing problem: although
the score is complete (and musically magnificent!), its rondo-like
outline requires the cellist to either improvise or write out
his or her own cadenzas between sections, something about which
Draeseke is emphatic in the manuscript orchestral score. The
version used in its 1935 premiere is still extant, but the question
of the supplemental work required by a cellist remains a hurdle
for any considerations of publication.
There
is minimal correspondence by Draeseke concerning his Violin
Concerto
in E minor, WoO 15, but that which is preserved in the
Draeseke holdings of the Saxon
State Library (Sächsische
Landes- und Universitätsbibliothek [SLUB]), Dresden
reveals that he regarded the concerto highly and held hopes for
its success
almost to the end of his career. From the composer’s own
documentation we know that the composition of the concerto was
reasonably fast. The first movement, Allegro appassionata (4/4),
was begun in early spring 1881 and was completed on the 1st of
May that year. The second movement Adagio (3/4) and
third movement
Allegro con brio e vivace (3/4) carry the respective
completion dates of July 12th and July 14th, or about two and
a half months
after the first movement.
Why
the violin concerto never achieved a complete performance during
Draeseke’s lifetime seems
inexplicable. If the composer seems to have lost some interest
in it in the immediately succeeding years, such a state might
be explained by the enormous exertions of the Symphonia
Tragica (Symphony No. 3 in C major, Op. 40) and the opera
Gudrun which followed close on the heels of the violin concerto
and were his
major preoccupations from 1882 to 1886. Why the violin concerto
remains unperformed to date in its complete orchestral guise,
can only be related by a series of unfortunate events culminating
in the disappearance of the manuscript orchestral score sometime
between 1941-45. To be sure, there is an arrangement of the
concerto’s
second movement Adagio for violin and keyboard published by Ries & Erler which dates to 1915, two years after Draeseke’s death and
with evident approval of his widow Frida. This movement is the
only section of the concerto which has ever been performed publicly – the
first time while Draeseke was alive.
Eric
Roeder, Draeseke’s
first biographer, reports on page 94 in the second volume
of his invaluable Felix Draeseke. Der Lebens- und Leidensweg
eines
deutschen Meisters (Felix Draeseke. The Path of
Life and Suffering for a German Master, Berlin, 1937) that in
April,
1886 the concertmaster
of the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra, Adolf Brodsky, performed
the Adagio from manuscript "…bei einer geistlichen
Abendmusik" (during an evening of musical meditation).
Since there is no record of orchestral parts for the performance
and since it took part in the Thomaskirche in Leipzig, one
can assume that Brodsky was accompanied on piano or what
seems even
more likely, on organ. Although there is no record of Draeseke’s
attendance, such cannot be excluded. Brodsky seems to have
been only one of a handful of violinists who had expressed
interest
in Draeseke’s concerto at the time and the composer
allowed Brodsky to retain the violin and piano reduction
of it until
October 1888, at which time he requested it to be returned:
in a letter from 1881 [SLUB] to one of his aunts, Draeseke
actually
expressed his hope that August Wilhelmj would give the premiere – "…otherwise there are only Jews" – adding unapologetically later "...I’m a confirmed anti-Semite." Wilhelmj did indeed look at the score, but promises of collaborative revision never materialized and Draeseke's concerto eventually found its way back to its composer. Ironically thereafter, the aforementioned Adolf Brodsky – himself a Jew – appears as the only violinist of Draeseke's day to have actually publicly played any of the work – the Adagio – before Draeseke, in the hope of satisfying a prospective publisher, requested its return.
According
to Roeder, Draeseke was convinced at the time that only publication
of the concerto would bring about a performance.
Unfortunately no publisher could be found and Draeseke
was proven correct in his convictions, for the concerto lay
by the wayside,
unpublished and unperformed to this day [Note added June 2009: The premiere performance of Draeseke's Violin Concerto (in its piano and violin version) as well as a performance of the Benda arrangement of the Adagio, took place at the June 2009 IDG Conference (click for details)].
As mentioned above,
the Adagio second movement, arranged for violin
and piano by Hans Benda [1] was published with evident
blessing by Frida
Draeseke
in 1915 by Ries & Erler in Berlin, though Erich Roeder
is not kind to this Benda edition and describes it as "eine
Bearbeitung" (an "arrangement") though the
English translation does not convey the pejorative implied
by Roeder’s comment, since the German can be rendered
as a "reworking" as
well and states that it doesn’t agree with the composer’s
manuscript. Evidently Frida Draeseke, who could be quite
demanding in the management of her husband’s estate,
considered it good enough and allowed Benda to publish
it. Whether Brodsky
contributed to this edition or influenced its publication
is not known.
Comparison of this printed movement with Draeseke’s own surviving violin and piano reduction [ms SLUB] reveals that only the opening and closing measures remain the same. Hans (Jean) Benda’s "arrangement" is a reworking in terms of a Fritz Kreisler free fantasy and far more virtuosic than anything in Draeseke’s original itself.
The
only complete analysis of Draeseke’s violin concerto
which has ever been published is that by Roeder in his
previously cited biographical study of the composer, and its
major point of reference is the presently missing orchestral
score. For those unacquainted with Roeder’s basic, but
often suspect, Draeseke study, one should be aware that one of
its must
frustrating and problematic aspects is an almost total lack of
music examples for the author’s analyses of compositions.
As interesting and as apparently filled with insights as they
may be, Roeder’s analyses present next to no idea of what
themes or passages sound like.
Draeseke
scholars have been unable to satisfactorily determine whether
Roeder, after publishing
the two volumes of his study, had intended a supplementary
volume containing music examples for his verbal descriptions
of them.
Considering the large number of Draeseke compositions unpublished,
or generally unavailable to the public in 1938 when the final
volume began to circulate, one must wonder just what it was
that Roeder hoped to achieve in his nearly 600 pages of verbal
analyses,
other than touching the nerve of instinctive enthusiasm in
the "true" German,
a basic tenet of his Nazi faith. Roeder can be very cunning and
devious in accounting facts, and it is only after initial readings
of his text that questions begin to arise concerning motivations,
performances, reactions and sequence of events.
The
beginning of Roeder’s analysis of Draeseke’s violin
concerto is a point in such discussion, for his analysis begins
not with
the first movement, but with the second, the aforementioned
Adagio and his opening statement is completely without context: "Gerade
dieser zyklisch angelegte 2. Satz (Adagio, 3/4) hätte
unsere um ein gutes neues Konzert verlegenen Geiger aufmerksam
machen müßen" ("It
is precisely this cyclically designed second movement [Adagio,
3/4] which would have to attract the attention of our violinists
of today who seek a new and worthwhile concerto"). "Cyclical" usually
refers in music to the overall design of a concerted (and
usually multi-movement) work, requiring both precedent and
antecedent
to make any formal sense.
In
the remainder of his analysis of the Adagio it slowly becomes
apparent that Roeder is simply referring
to A-B-A outline and repetition of material in the development
of the movement and is not mentioning any of the Adagio’s
themes being related to or recalled in material of the
movements which flank it. Roeder then continues his analysis
with observations
about the concerto’s first movement (Allegro appassionata,
4/4), mentioning that it begins without introduction in
the home key of E minor and the immediate entrance of the
violin with
the main theme contained in its "Triolenmotiv,
Baustoff für das ganze Werk (Einheitsthematik)" ("Motivic
triplet motion, building material for the whole work [thematic
unity]"). Roeder’s descriptive analysis makes
reference to a number of unusual maneuvers on this first
movement, but
without a score, much less some music examples, a verbal
recounting of what Roeder has written obviates his observations.
The same
can be said for his treatment of the finale (Allegro con
brio e vivace, 3/4) a rondo which re-introduces material
from the preceding movements before a final virtuosic dash
to the
end. Roeder “describes” the movement as a saltarello
- Draeseke actually writes the word in his score! – because
of the rhythmic emphases in the main themes and suggests
that it was inspired by a visit of Draeseke to Ischia the
preceding
year.
Although
the orchestral score and presumed set of parts for Draeseke’s
violin concerto have disappeared, the work is not really "lost",
for a violin and piano reduction, obviously made for rehearsal
purposes, is housed in the music
manuscript collection of the Saxon State Library in Dresden under
the catalog entry MUS 7099-B-501. There are two folios. The first
contains movements 2 and 3 (Adagio and Finale) and the second,
the first movement (Allegro appassionato). This unusual juxtaposition
of folios may account for the catalog entry’s parenthetical
note of "unvollständig" (incomplete) and could
lead one to the conclusion that there is music missing from this
reduction. A pdf version of the SLUB mansuscript is available at draeseke.org.
The concerto is 100% intact, though this writer’s
microfilm from SLUB did not include a solo violin part, possibly
another reason for the term "unvollständig" on
the entry. All of the pages of this reduction are in perfect
numbered sequence: 27 for the first movement, 6 for the Adagio
and 15 for the finale and there are no measures missing or crossed
out. When ordering the microfilm for this material, it was verified
and guaranteed that the folios were received in exactly the juxtaposition
described above, directly from the estate of Frida Draeseke and
the catalog entry, in consideration of that, will evidently
not be changed. It doesn’t take a particularly well-trained
eye to note the discrepancy in the spelling of Violinconcert
(with two "c's" instead of the more normal German with
a "k" and "z":
Violinkonzert) on the folio containing movements 2 and 3, but
Violinconzert on
folio 2 with the first movement. The handwriting seems different
between the two folios, though there is no existing correspondence
indicating that Draeseke paid copyists for the violin and piano
reduction.
Roeder’s
discussion of the concerto in his study of Draeseke makes
frequent reference to material presented by
various instruments and instrumental groups throughout the
work, so it is obvious to assume that he was working
with the orchestral
score which, alas, seems to have been the only copy ever made.
Whether this score is lost irretrievably, one cannot say, since
the search for it has only been underway for a short while
and with admittedly piecemeal endeavor. When did this
score disappear?
How did the score disappear? In reference to question No. 1
the answer is simply: sometime between 1941 and 1945. There
is no answer as to how it disappeared. Speculation
reigns
at present as to its possible (though not exact) location,
and there is the possibility that the orchestra score
was lost or
destroyed during the Russian sweep through Silesia toward the
end of the war: the last place the score was known to be, was
Liegnitz (today Legnica in Polish), a town which suffered enormous
damage during the Russian advance.
Let
us turn to the year 1941. Spring is approaching. No one
is aware that
Hitler’s Operation
Barbarossa, the invasion
of the Soviet Union, is but a few months away. Less than a year
before Hitler had enjoyed his most prestigious victory, the fall
of France. It had been a relatively tranquil period for the Germans,
a pause before the storm, with only Italy’s ineptitude
in Greece and North Africa requiring any serious military commitment
from them. Erich Roeder had made his transition from SA man to
lieutenant [2] in the Wehrmacht, Sonderdienst Kultureinsatz (Special
Service, Cultural Regulation [3]). It had been five years since
the big celebrations of Draeseke in his hometown of Coburg during
the 1935 hundredth anniversary of Draeseke's birth, which were
sponsored by the Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft, officially founded
in 1932.
By 1940 the Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft had gathered funds, and
political backing, for what would have been an even more extensive
celebration of Draeseke’s music: a week long series of
concerts, vocal, chamber and orchestral which was to culminate
in a staged version of his opera Gudrun – the opera’s
first production since 1893.
The
place chosen for the festival was the Silesian city of
Liegnitz, a city which, at the time,
had a population of about 80,000. (If you take your finger
and place it on Dresden on a map, you can slide it almost
straight
to Breslau [Wroclaw today] and Liegnitz [or Legnica] would
be almost directly in between). The musical importance
of Liegnitz
in 1941 would be roughly that of a Hagen or a Wuppertal in
the Ruhrgebiet of Germany today. If Draeseke himself had
had any
connections with Liegnitz during his lifetime, they must have
been minimal, if at all.
The
1941 program for the week's offerings appears as an appendix
to this paper. Aside from being mailed
from the Liegnitz
concert association, this program was also printed in the Mitteilungsblatt Nr.
6 of the Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft issued in early 1941.
An explanation for the ultimate postponement
of this festival had to wait for the society’s Mitteilungsblatt Nr.
7 which the FDG issued in the late spring of 1943 -as it
turned out, this would be the last official Information
Sheet
from the Felix
Draeseke Gesellschaft ever. The booklet is barely twenty
pages long, but it is crammed with invaluable
information
relevant to Draeseke research and above all, in reference
to Draeseke's’s violin concerto. On what is the 8th
numbered page the editor of the document reproduces a letter
received
from the civic music director in Liegnitz and official organizer
of the Draeseke festival, Heinrich Weidinger [4]. The letter
is dated 3 July 1941, shortly after the invasion of Russia.
Weidinger
writes (for the sake of brevity, only the English translation
is provided here):
„The
present situation places us here before difficult decisions.
After recent call ups by the Wehrmacht, we must reckon
with even more and because of this the realization of the
Draeseke festival was jeopardized. To judge from present
developments,
a substitute is out of the question because of such short
notice. Furthermore, we can be certain that our male
chorus will also
be inducted. Along with them will be a call up of members
of our orchestra, making the performance of the orchestral
concerts
questionable. Without potential substitute forces it is impossible
for me to guarantee use of a reliable ensemble, and I have
just come from a discussion with our mayor concerning
this. The ultimate
result of all this is the postponement of the Draeseke festival
until after the war. The members of the
Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft are being sent a special notice.“
If
one looks at the first
two planned orchestral concerts on the program, one notes
that both Draeseke’s
violin concerto [5] and symphonic poem Frithjof
were receiving their first performances. In the paragraph following
the above quoted letter by Heinrich Weidinger in the Mitteilungsblatt,
the FDG reports that the composer’s widow, Frida Draeseke,
who had died 14 November 1942, had assumed the costs for
the preparation of the score and parts for not only Frithjof,
but
also for the symphonic poem Julius Caesar, the composer’s
first effort in the genre. There is absolutely no mention of
preparation of a fair copy orchestral score and corresponding
set of parts for the violin concerto, despite the fact that
the violin concerto was announced for performance – the
symphonic poem Julius Caesar was not.
The
situation with the violin concerto becomes even more intriguing
when one reads a page or so later in the
Mitteilungsblatt that the wishes expressed in Frida Draeseke’s
will and testament regarding her husband’s works are
being carried out according to her instructions: namely, that
Draeseke’s
manuscripts were to be housed in the Dresden State Archives.
A certain Dr. Müller-Benidict was in charge of the reception
and cataloging of the manuscripts and he sent a list of the
received manuscripts to the governance of the Felix Draeseke
Gesellschaft, which at the time was in the hands of Erich Roeder
and Dr. Hermann Stephani (a pupil of Draeseke’s and author
of the entry on Draeseke in the first edition of Die Musik
in Geschichte und Gegenwart). No list was found among
Stephani’s
personal effects after his death in 1960 and any list which
Roeder may have had has ever been found and Dr. Müller-Benidict's
own list of manuscripts was evidently considered irrelevant
or unimportant when the communist regime of the German Democratic
Society "reorganized" libraries within its state.
However, among the works mentioned in the Mitteilungsblatt Nr.
7 of the Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft received by Müller-Benidict
there is no mention of a manuscript of an orchestral score
for the
Violin Concerto in E minor, WoO 15, nor any reference
to
a set of performance parts. Only the violin and piano reduction
is noted.That is where the mystery remains.
The
postwar dissolution of the Felix Draeseke Gesellschaft
is badly documented.
Suffice it to say that by 1962, two years after
the death of Hermann Stephani, the one substantial source of
funds as well as the source of legal credibility for the Felix
Draeseke Gesellschaft, the composer’s home town of Coburg,
disassociated itself from the cause of Felix Draeseke and withdrew
support of the society. Few people in Coburg at that time had
much interest for the composer, a situation exacerbated by perception
that his own musical style and his personal associations during
his lifetime aided the rise of Nazism. Yet there was a younger
generation of musicians, music historians, and members of the
musical public who would be awakened to the cause of this remarkable
composer and especially after 1980, organize a new society
on behalf of his music: the Internationale
Draeseke Gesellschaft (1986) and later the International
Draeseke Society / North America (1993). This
author is, of course, part of that younger generation.
As
an undergraduate at Syracuse University between 1957-61 this
writer had the
good fortune to make the acquaintance of a music
librarian at the time, Mrs.
Antje Lemke, recently arrived from East
Germany and, as it turns out, daughter of the eminent theologian
Rudolf
Bultmann. The display of astonishment which came over
her when this writer mentioned the name Draeseke to her in the
spring of 1959 gave way to an eagerness to put me in contact
with all
who she knew to have been personally associated with Draeseke
or had been active in the Gesellschaft. Mrs. Lemke translated
my first letters of inquiry to Hermann Stephani, then in his
final years at the University of Marburg in West Germany. In
one of those letters, calling Stephani’s attention to
my violin teacher Louis Krasner, the man who commissioned Alban
Berg’s
violin concerto, it was suggested that Krasner might have interest
for Draeseke’s violin concerto. Stephani dealt with this
naive inquiry in a cryptic, but friendly, manner: "Das
Konzert liegt wohl heute in russischem Bestand" (The concerto
is probably today in some Russian collection) [6]. That remains
even today the leading clue as to the possible whereabouts of
the
orchestral score to the Violin Concerto in E minor, WoO 15 by
Felix Draeseke.
Music examples are reproduced with
permission of Saxon State and University Library Dresden (catalogue signature number MUS 7099 - B - 501).
The full copy of the score to the Violin Concerto in the piano reduction is available on line.
Notes
1.
It is mentioned in the body of the paper that the arrangement
of the Adagio which was published in 1915 is by Hans Benda.
This is the name provided in the IDG Felix Draeseke Chronik
seines Lebens, but Erich Roeder ascribes it to a Jean Benda.
To be sure, Jean is the equivalent for the German (Jo)hannes. Although initial speculation suggested that the arranger was the noted conductor Hans von Benda, it has now been ascertained that Hans (Jean) Benda is the virtuouso violinist and pedagogue who was active in Berlin in the first part of the 20th Century. See also the update of June 2009.
2.
From hearsay the author included the rank of Erich Roeder
as that of lieutenant. Others have offered conjecture but
not verified facts. The ranks of captain and major have
been suggested. Clarification is needed. 3. Whether there was in the Wehrmacht an organization or
department specifically
named Sonderdienst Kultureinsatz has also not been established,
although some unit regarding cultural operations did exist,
especially for newly conquered territories. In 1941 Liegnitz
was a German city and, as such, such a unit may not have
been operative, though the Polish occupation between the
wars may have warranted such a unit in the eyes of the
Nazis. Clarification is needed.
4.
There has been no response for information concerning
Heinrich Weidinger, the Liegnitz music director in
1941. Information regarding him would be welcome.
5. There has been no response
for information regarding the post-1941 career of the proposed
soloist for the premiere
of the Draeseke violin concerto, Willibald Roth, then
concertmaster of the Dresden Staatskapelle . Attempts to
contact direct
descendants have been thus far to no avail. In formation
regarding Willibald Roth would be welcome.
6. The
letter from Hermann Stephani to this author from 1959 which
simply
states that Draeseke’s violin concerto
is probably in a Russian collection, was surrendered to Martin
Stephani, along with several others written to this writer
by his father, when the author visited Martin Stephani at
his office as director of the Detmold music conservatory
in September of 1961. One assumes that the letters are part
of the late Martin Stephani’s estate.
7. The first complete performance of Draeseke's Violin Concerto (piano and violin) as well as a performance of the Benda arrangement of the Adagio, took place at the June 2009 IDG Conference in Meiningen and Bad Rodach (click for details).
© Alan H. Krueck 2000/2009
|